The Depths of the Gospel


As of late I have been thinking about words and books. I read a lot—as much as I can make time for. And I have read many books and many articles over the years of formal education courses and the pursuit of my own interests. I could list many authors and many books from whom and from which I have gleaned truly helpful insights; the ability of those authors to paint meaning with words is extraordinary and it is pleasing to read the fruit of their labors.

Yet in all these thoughts my attention has been drawn back to Scripture and especially to the Gospel narratives. Why do I return to them again and again? I have read the Bible many times and that in many different English translations. I have studied portions of the biblical text in Hebrew and Greek. I have read commentaries on Scripture by the most learned men (and women) from multiple generations of the Churches’ history. Yet I continue to return to the text of Scripture and especially the Lord’s words and deeds. I can never exhaust the depths of the Gospel narrative because of the One whose life and words are recorded therein.

That great whimsical Christian writer G.K. Chesterton made a helpful observation that is quite relevant to the general point I am bringing up.

“Every attempt to amplify that story has diminished it. The task has been attempted by many men of real genius and eloquence as well as by only too many vulgar sentimentalists and self-conscious rhetoricians. The tale has been retold with patronizing pathos by elegant sceptics and with fluent enthusiasm by boisterous best-sellers. It will not be retold here. The grinding power of the plain words of the Gospel story is like the power of mill-stones; and those who can read them simply enough will feel as if rocks had been rolled upon them. Criticism is only words about words; and of what use are words about such words as these? What is the use of word-painting about the dark garden filled suddenly with torchlight and furious faces? ‘Are you come out with swords and staves as against a robber? All day I sat in your temple teaching, and you took me not.’ Can anything be added to the massive and gathered restraints of that irony; like a great wave lifted to the sky and refusing to fall? ‘Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me but weep for yourselves and for your children.’ As the High Priest asked what further need he had of witnesses, we might well ask what further need we have of words. Peter in a panic repudiated him: ‘and immediately the cock crew; and Jesus looked upon Peter, and Peter went out and wept bitterly.’ Has anyone any further remarks to offer?”[i]

I could continue to quote Chesterton at length here, as he continues on his usual brilliance and forceful yet whimsical argumentation. This captures the point which I want to emphasis: The uniqueness of the Lord’s words and deeds are unparalleled; the scholar is confounded by them and left to yield the heart and the mind in order to even begin to understand their meaning and the significance for this life and eternity. The simple person can read them in faith and gather an astonishingly accurate level of understanding of them. For this is the witness of the living God spoken from the holy Son of God. They are without equal and they stand as the central reference point for all seekers of the true God.

I have read much on the long history of interpretation of the Bible and I find myself concurring with Chesterton’s assessment: The words of human readers are mere words—even the most insightful and learned and wise statements. The depths of the Gospel are like pools which are opaque even at close inspection—the natural human mind can barely make sense of them because they emerge from the very mind of God. Their meaning is plain yet it is hidden from the carnal person who seeks to take them as tools to satisfy his or her own self-interest.

The heretics cannot abide by them because to do so would require becoming like a little child. Such persons are beyond that and steeped in their hubris and self-importance and confidence in comprehending reality according to principles born of carnal-mindedness. To know their meaning requires knowing and loving and obeying the One who spoke them and demonstrated their power in deeds. That is too much for most people. They assess the cost and decide to walk away or try to bend the Lord himself into their notions of Deity and spirituality.

The depths of the Gospel are rooted in the Person of Lord himself. Thus his words and deeds defy the complicated sophistication of the scholar or philosopher. And thus they challenge the simple person to apply his mind as well as his heart to hearing them in order to obey. Without experientially knowing the One who came one cannot plume the depths of the Gospel. The Holy Spirit does not instruct anyone in Truth except in the way faith seeking understanding through obedience.

[i] G.K. Chesterton, The Everlasting Man, chapter entitled “The Strangest Story in the World”; cited from G.K. Chesterton Collected Works, Volume 2 [Ignatius:1986], 340-341.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theophan the Recluse on Combating the Passions

  “Keep to one thing: When the passionate is detected, immediately arm yourself against it with wrath and hostile anger. This anger in spiritual warfare has the very same significance as when an evil person is assaulting you; you have to strike back at him hard. . . . What does the victim of an assault by an evil person do? After striking the person, he calls for help. The watchmen answer his call and save him from trouble. This is also what must be done in spiritual warfare with the passions. Once you have become angry at the passion, you have to call out for help: Be attentive to my help, O Lord of my salvation! O Lord, be attentive unto my help, make haste to help me! When appealing to the Lord in this manner, do not fall away from Him through attention toward what is going on inside of you, but keep standing before the Lord, imploring Him for help. Run at once from this enemy as from a blazing fire.  There is something others have done, and perhaps do even now. That is, once they
Read more

Christendom, Converts and Spiritual Conversion

  “Through all those centuries of clashing and changing frontiers, Christendom in terms of time and space extended itself. Its missionaries succeeded among the barbaric as they had among the cultured, and such gatherings as the Synod of Whitby, far by the North Sea and almost on the edge of the ancient Empire, repeated, to their degree, the Council of Nicaea. Both the Gospel and the Creed mastered the new world. But the method of conversion had perhaps changed somewhat. In the old days it had been individuals who had been converted, either by intellectual persuasion or spiritual violence, by grace, by intellect, or (at lowest) by fashion. But now it was whole communities which were abruptly annexed. The prestige, the power, and no doubt sometimes the piety of Christendom subdued one dynasty after another; a sudden rain of culture and Christianity descended over their territories, and the Christianity was often no more than the chief interference of the culture. The mass of the converts
Read more

The Charisms of the Holy Spirit in the Life of Churches

The affirmation and exercise of charisms has varied over time and been shaped by the prevailing theological assumptions about formal church structure and leadership of a given tradition. Theological assumptions are, as a matter of course, profoundly colored by the perspectives of the people developing them in the context of the current hegemonic cultural presuppositions. This is especially true of ecclesiology and pneumatology. Indeed, the ways in which different Christian traditions have come to counterbalance these two categories of Christian theology speaks volumes about their fundamental views of God and human salvation. The different intellectual categories which systematic theologians attempt to describe are all intertwined in people’s actual thought and practice.  In churches with a traditional emphasis on the Episcopal model of leadership and ministry the focus of thought has been on the position and work of formal leaders. The ministry of laypersons was not emphasized becau
Read more